Pale Greens Honor Climate Vandals

For some, a tiny tax outweighs massive environmental destruction

by Roger Annis

At first glance, it seemed that the “Yes Men” had scored another comedic coup for Mother Earth. CBC Radio news reported on December 16 that on the previous day, British Columbia Premier Gordon Campbell was feted and presented an environmental award by many of Canada’s well-heeled “environmental groups” during the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen.

Hah! Great gag, guys! And very timely. An embarrassingly large number of people and agencies in Canada and abroad have been hoodwinked by the BC government’s claims to environmental stewardship and its greenwashing propaganda.

But wait, the story proves to be true and not a gag at all! Campbell actually did receive an ‘Economy Wide Carbon Pricing’ award from Tzeporah Berman of PowerUp Canada, one of ten of Canada’s best funded “environmental groups” that endorsed the award, presented at a gala recognizing “acts of climate leadership” by municipal and provincial governments across Canada.

Other award endorsers are the David Suzuki Foundation, the Ecology Action Centre, Environmental Defence, Équiterre, ForestEthics, the Green Energy Act Alliance, the Pembina Institute, TckTckTck, and WWF Canada.

The principal justification for the award is British Columbia’s so-called “carbon tax,” introduced in early 2008. The tax is 2.3 cents per liter of gasoline, to rise to 7 cents by 2012. Revenue from the tax is purportedly returned to taxpayers in the form of reductions to other taxes.

Matt Horne of the Pembina Institute said his group recognizes the “inconsistencies” in B.C.’s climate policies, but the carbon tax is strong enough to stand on its own. When asked whether the carbon tax has demonstrably reduced greenhouse gas emissions in the province, he said “in terms of solid evidence that it’s working, I think it’s too early to tell.”

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson also accepted an award for the city’s “green initiatives.” These include, according to the mayor, “the most ambitious greenhouse gas reduction targets in North America” and mandated electric car plug-ins in new developments.

In 2008, British Columbia was the only province in the country to report a net increase in greenhouse gas emissions from major industries, according to recent figures released by Environment Canada. The figures report “facility greenhouse gas emissions” from power plants and heavy industries such as mining, pulp and paper, and petroleum.

Oil, gas, coal and roads

The emissions increases were largely due to the rapid and vast expansion in recent years of oil and gas extraction in the province. A new Gold Rush prevails today in the northern and southeast corners of the province, nearly on the scale of the Tar Sands disaster in neighboring Alberta. Billions of dollars land leasing rights and construction of gas and oil extraction facilities has been made in recent years, along with related construction of pipelines and electricity transmission lines.

The sale of oil and gas land lease rights hit a record in the calendar year 2008 at $2.7 billion. This year closed at $893 million. The BC government, which describes the province as “The Best Place on Earth” on its websites, provides generous subsidies to the oil and gas industries, calling them a “stimulus package.”

Most of the gas drilling is into shale rock, using the hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” method. This involves blasting through rock with a mixture of water, sand and chemicals to split the rock and release gas. Like the extraction and processing of tar sands, shale gas extraction is a heavily energy-intensive and CO2-spewing process.

Additionally, the composition of the chemicals used is considered a trade secret and largely unregulated. Concern over the pollution of groundwaters caused by hydraulic fracturing has led the city of New York to urge the New York legislature to ban gas drilling in the city’s watershed.

There is also concern that the provincial government could move to lift the decades-old ban on oil and gas drilling along the British Columbia coast. Already, it plans to allow fuel tankers into the northern port of Kitimat to export Alberta Tar Sands products and provide needed fuel imports (Tar Sands extraction requires large imports of light crude oil). A proposed $3 billion liquefied gas import/export facility is currently on the hunt for financing.

British Columbia’s mining and export of coal has received little attention from environmental activists and climate researchers. The province has coal reserves of 20 billion tons. It exported 28 million tons in 2007. Exports in 2008 were worth a whopping $5.4 billion. Vancouver is the largest coal-exporting port in North America.

The province is also embarked on a vast, multi-billion dollar expansion of the road network in the Vancouver region. Meanwhile, the transit authority continues to hike fares and has scrapped plans to build a long-promised and much-needed rapid transit line to the region’s northeast. Fares have gone up approximately 40 per cent over the past eight years.

Voices of dissent

The Sierra Club did not participate in the Copenhagen award gala. Executive Director George Heyman, a former long-time president of the BC Government Employees Union, said the BC Liberals have taken a lot of actions that are “deeply contradictory” to its greenwashing propaganda.

Heyman pointed out that fuel is exempt from the soon-to-be-imposed Harmonized Sales Tax, but the labour for energy efficient home retrofits is not.

“They’re also providing massive subsidies to the oil and gas industry. . . and supporting a massive pipeline to move dirty tar sands oil across B.C.,” he said.

Voices of concern are on the rise from the Indigenous peoples living in the coal and gas rich regions. Writing in the Vancouver Sun on December 22, Kathie Dickie, Chief of the 800-member Fort Nelson First Nation, expressed grave concern over two giant gas processing facilities being built near Fort Nelson, in northeast B.C.

Chief Dickie wrote there has been no meaningful consultation with her people concerning the environmental impacts of En Cana Corporation’s Cabin Gas Plant nor a Spectra Gas plant to be located 15 kilometers away.

Cabin Gas, once constructed, will be the largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the province. One BC government official told the Fort Nelson First Nation that its 100-year old treaty with Canada does not guarantee clean air.

“Imagine being told by a government official in 2009 that you have no say on the quality of air you or your children breathe! What parent would stand for it?” Dickie asked.

The pale green groups that honored Gordon Campbell should be ashamed. His government should be condemned, not praised.

Roger Annis is an aerospace worker in Vancouver and an editor of Socialist Voice. He can be reached at rogerannis(at)hotmail.com. Much of the information on the climate award was reported by Colleen Kimmet in The Hook.

Posted in Greens, NGOs, Indigenous
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Jeff White
6 years 7 months ago

Now the “pale greens” at the Suzuki Foundation have honoured the 2010 Winter Olympics with a “bronze medal” for “efforts to reduce the event’s climate impact”.

Meanwhile, this obscene corporate juggernaut posing as a sporting event continues to be one of the most environmentally destructive Olympics ever. Tens of thousands of trees were cut down and mountainsides blasted away to create Olympic venues in the Callaghan Valley, and in the expansion of the highways. Black bear habitats were so badly impacted by the construction that record numbers of the animals have been killed and injured in highway accidents as they flee their territory. Salmon beds in the Fraser River have been disrupted as tons of gravel have been removed to make concrete for the games. Much of the environmental damage has been carried out on unceded indigenous land.

And on Monday, vast convoys of trucks began hauling snow from mountain tops in a provincial park to Cypress Mountain, site of the snowboard and freestyle skiing events. The organizers didn’t count on El Niño bringing mild winter weather to Vancouver and melting the snow. Now they are using not only carbon-burning trucks but helicopters, snow movers, and snow grooming machines to bring in snow for the events.

The Vancouver Olympic are dealing with the problem of climate change by ramping up the emissions that will ensure the continuation of the problem!

Gerard
6 years 8 months ago

And to think I once had the impression that Canada proudly stood against the rapacious values of the USA. Now rectified.

The dollars wins…. everywhere.

Jeff White
6 years 8 months ago

Check out the roster of names on the B.C. government’s “advisory task forces” on “Green Energy”. In among the captains of industry you will find the names of Tzeporah Berman and representatives of the Pembina Institute and the Suzuki Foundation. This award to Gordon Campbell is just one hand greenwashing the other.

“This task force has been set up to persuade the people of BC to allow wild rivers to be developed en masse by private American corporations for the purpose of providing ‘Green’ power to the insatiable American market.” – Source

Many of these pale green groups have been openly supporting the right-wing Campbell government for many months. See here.

The governments of British Columbia and Vancouver weren’t the only ones to receive greenwash awards from this motley crew. See their PRESS RELEASE for the names of other provinces and cities that received their environmental awards.

Kevin Skerrett
6 years 8 months ago

This is an important exposure not just of the Campbell government’s (widely known) disastrous policies, but much more importantly the impoverished strategic thinking inside the named “green” NGOs endorsing this award. In particular, the Suzuki Foundation, WWF, and Pembina – as among the highest profile environmental organizations in the country – need to be persuaded that such ill considered support for such a backward government is self-defeating and dangerous. I suppose, as the climate crisis deepens and the politics of it shakes out, we will reach several moments at which political parties, groups, NGOs, etc., will have to really answer the Phil Ochs question: “Which side are you on?…” The decision to collaborate with and feed the propaganda strategies of the Gordon Cambell government is an obvious such moment. I’d be interested to know, apart from Sierra Club (as noted here), which of the other environmental groups are not walking this path…

wpDiscuz